This topic is in the Socialist discussion forum.  (rss)


Social Democracy - The only REAL way forward for the left


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 14-6-2005 @ 05:27 AM by John Pearce


It's time to dispell the belief that true, pure, socialism, whether achieved through democratic or revolutionary means, could ever exsist. For a Socialist system to truely exist people would have to be "perfect", they would have to not be greedy, selfish, or self-indulgent. All of these things Socialists and Communists take so much for granted. But as demonstrated through history, the attempted application of a true Socialist system has NEVER, and will NEVER work because humans ARE NOT PERFECT. It's lack of success has been demonstrated in the USSR, Cuba, N. Korea, Vietnam, China, etc. It simply does not work, becasue there are alwasy people who feel they have to have power.

The words I often hear next are "There has never been Socialism, so how can you judge whether or not it works?" Well, its extremely easy to judge, because its attempted installation in many places around the world, by leaders who (most of the time) want "true" Socialism, always fail to deliver. As a system, it would bring about much happiness to the masses, but it is FUNDEMENTALY flawed, becasue it does not take HUMAN NATURE in to account.

The simple fact is, the human being is a naturally Capitalist mammal. We naturally trade goods and services, and naturally are materialistic. and becasue of this we NEED capitalism to survive in an environment which is suited best to our natural needs. Don't get me wrong, I don't love capitalism and all the problems it brings to our world, but we need it.

Just because we need Capitalism, doesnt mean we can't implement left-wing measures to control its negative effects; Trade-Unions, welfare state, state ownership of vital national resources etc. By being as left-wing as possible within a Capitalist system, we can control, stabilize and provide for the masses, whilst giving people the freedom of oppertunity to start a business, provide jobs, and make a success of themselves. We can also make laws to ensure that business' stick to TIGHT LEGISLATION, stopping them from the exploitation of its workers.

We need capitalism. We need Socialism. The two combined make Social-Democracy. (Think post-war Brittain, the then social-democratic Labour government under Clement Atlee.)

Social-Democracy is the only way to ensure equality AND freedom.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-6-2005 @ 12:50 AM by danwild6


John I have to agree with you whole heartedly I have always had a problem with utopian philosophies. I had a friend a while back a typical rich kid had everything handed to him on a silver platter he had an unwavering belief in communism I tried to explain to him why communism would never work in that it is impossible to create heaven on earth why? Because people are flawed we are not gods we can be selfabsorbed we can be selfish we selfindulge we have fears sometimes irrational we get jealous we get angry how does this all tie in well marx said it himself religion is the opium of the masses you see there is no god so we must become gods. This is lunacy we are at best noble creatures but we are flawed creatures I finally asked my friend if he knew of a utopia that ever existed he said no because it has never been tried(the value of even a highly priced american education).



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-7-2005 @ 12:51 PM by Odium



Originally posted by John Pearce
The words I often hear next are "There has never been Socialism, so how can you judge whether or not it works?" Well, its extremely easy to judge, because its attempted installation in many places around the world, by leaders who (most of the time) want "true" Socialism, always fail to deliver.


So due to the fact something fails the first time we should never attempt to do it again? Is that your honest-view of this?

Also, I'd like a list of leaders which attempted to place in true Socialism if you don't mind.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-7-2005 @ 09:28 PM by Kidfinger


So how do you suppose this 'Social Democracy' would run? How would you hae it set up? Would there be similar Senate and congress? What about presidential powers?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-7-2005 @ 10:01 AM by Odium



Originally posted by Kidfinger
So how do you suppose this 'Social Democracy' would run? How would you hae it set up? Would there be similar Senate and congress? What about presidential powers?


I think John Pearce has vanished, I can answer how a Socialist Goverment and a Democratic-Socialist Government should be set up if you wish though?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-7-2005 @ 02:49 PM by Kidfinger



Originally posted by Odium


I think John Pearce has vanished, I can answer how a Socialist Goverment and a Democratic-Socialist Government should be set up if you wish though?


I was hoping to hear his brand of it before we got down to the nuts and bolts of the system But since he appears to have vanished, then by all means Odium, you have the floor



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-7-2005 @ 03:00 PM by Odium



Harmony by Peter "Jayce" Sanford.
The New Style of Government will be a “system”, which is “By the People, for the People”. It will move away from the idea of “Rule from the Top” and allow participation of the Public in the legislative decisions that will have major effect on them and the Nation with elected representatives. Split into two Divisions outlined later on.

This New Government will first have to ratify the below constitution, which will justify equality and protection to all by it majority or minority. Once this is in place they can then begin to pass legislation to uphold these import aspects of Society:
  1. We shall not limit freedom of thought, speech, sexual orientation or Religion and the rights that come with these..
  2. We shell not judge on race, creed, gender, ideology or sexual orientation but actions.
  3. We shall be respectful of the rights of others and give equality to all regardless.
  4. We shall be honest, in Government, Industry and any arm of the state.
  5. We shall be responsible for our actions.
  6. We shall be fair in all matters to all persons.
  7. We shall be considerate of the happiness and well being of others.
  8. We shall have the right to protect ourselves from the Tyranny be it by Government or the Public.
  9. We shall nurture these values by word & deed in our children, family, friends and acquaintances.
  10. We shall not limit inquiring or testing by their consequences, on any matter, including this Constitution.
1) Everyone should have the right to say what they think, think what they wish, have adult relationships with those who they deem appropriate and practice what Religion they wish as long as none of these infringe on the Liberties of others or attempt to do harm to another.

2) The Judiciary will be built to represent the Nation, both on Gender, Ethnicity and Social Class. People will be judged on the legal issues, social issues and moral issues of their case. With Council given to both Prosecution and Defence; unless stated otherwise. They will be a “Trial by Pear” unless the case is so complex that it would be hard to understand; such as fraud which will have a special judiciary or one that needs to be kept from the public for reasons of National Security.

3) No law will target one group over another on the fact that they are “different” nor will any “Arm of the State” give special treatment to someone regarding their differences; with the exception of the infirm, mentally ill, physically disabled and children.

4) The Government will be open to both public inquiry and private, the actions which they take should be clear and information they gain should be open to the public - unless in the interests of National Security. All documents older then 5 years, unless being used in a current case will be viewable by the Public and all past Government Crimes will be admitted to.

5) As displayed above, the Government will be responsible for what it does. If the Government knowingly misleads the Public on anything then that Member of the Government will be suspended once there guilt has been proven and they will be accountable in a Court of Law.

6) As outlined above, the Government will run a Policy that does not discriminate against the people in anyway. Acts of discrimination will carry a heavy sentence - with the result of loss of both earnings and liberty. This is the only way to stop the unnecessary bigotry that is evident within modern Society.

7) The Government will work as best it can to provide happiness for the Public, in the form of Social Policy which will attempt to allow them the life they wish to lead. With no infringement on personal life - unless harm is being forced upon an unwilling party. This Social Policy will also best reflect the area that it is representing as not one policy can best server every area of a Nation.

8) The General Public should be able to defend themselves from the Governments of Nations which intend to do them harm and their own Government if it intends to do them harm. A Policy which includes the education of children from an early age about gun control and gun safety should be adopted. Similar to Switzerland and Spain which has some of the lowest homicide rates in the Western World.


9) This Constitution will be outlined and easy to understand as will the legal system; the general public should not need to pay council to have a document translated for them in their native country. Schools should also include classes on educating children about their liberties and of the struggles in which people have had to go through over the past to give us these liberties.

10) The People should have the right to openly debate points of law, both National and Local. This allows for the set up of a Civil Service Group independent of the Government which will allow Town Halls, etc, to be used so these debates can take place and people can voice their opinions. Local Government officials should also attend 2 meetings a month in their area to hear opinions of the public and then bring these back to the Parliament in discussions.

One this constitution has been ratified then the Government will work on implementing radical reforms of their National assembly which will be split into two tiers; the first will have the majority of representatives of the Country and will be elected every 4 years the second will hold 10% as many politicians as the first and run a 4 year term, separated by 2 years from the first.

The two systems will have different areas, allowing for a better representation of the general public for example: in the British Political System there are 646 Constituencies and allowing for 646 members in their first tier of Government, the second tier would allow for 65 members (64.6 rounded up) and each member in the second tier would have a larger constituency then the first tier. This diverse system should allow for laws to be regulated better as both tiers are elected and not hereditary and also give a more diverse representation in the second tier. This is then mirrored down to the Regional Level, but on a smaller scale.



That's from one of my unfinished books, it basically outlines how Democracy would best work in Socialist ideology - however it is only a draft.

It mainly revolves around the system the Swiss use, which is one of "Direct Democracy" but within reason - allowing the people to have referendum on moral issues and laws which they "dislike" or are of "great" public interest but allow the elected body to pass judgement on other laws which are far to technical for the public.

Here is some info: en.wikipedia.org...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-7-2005 @ 04:01 PM by paperclip


Just for the record, social democracy exists already in many european countries, it is works just fine... well, it works, though improvements are always needed

The "social" part of social democracy has more to do with how economy is viewed and how the goverment is involved in certain things. It basically means that state provides for certain aspects of life of underprivileged, like good organized welfare system, healthcare, education, stuff like that, sort of give poor kids the same starting chance in life like the rich kids have.
For a country to have enough money for it, it has to have higher taxes for rich and it has to have a good economy... that is if I understand it correctly.
Such systems work just fine in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Austria, Switzerland etc, etc.
It seems that the bigger the country the more difficult is to maintain such system. Germany is currently having problems with it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-7-2005 @ 04:53 PM by Sauron


Does no one here know what kind of society Canada is?
well it's a social democracy and it works just fine overall.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-7-2005 @ 05:36 PM by Odium


Except with the case of Sweden, most Social-Democratic Nations, are ran by big business and not the people though. Which is the problem and the people do not yet have enough involvement in the political process, with the except of Switzerland.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-7-2005 @ 05:15 PM by John Pearce


Sorry I haven´t replied in AGES! I´m currently in Mexico City about to go off and do some aid work. I´m in a hotel right next to the presidential palace and thier main Cathedral! I really cannot talk rght now as I have to email my parents and I only have a few minutes left on the pay computer, but just thought I´d letyou knowwhy Ihaven´t replied.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-7-2005 @ 10:27 AM by TrueLies



Originally posted by Kidfinger
So how do you suppose this 'Social Democracy' would run? How would you hae it set up? Would there be similar Senate and congress? What about presidential powers?


Well, look at canada, they're quasi socialst...

Let's take a look at their problems and successes...Corporate monopolies (bell canada, banking institutions)Homosexual marriages (of which i have no problem with), huge taxes (have big problem with that), abortion on demand, anti-American attitudes, a military in shambles, unprecedented government corruption, and significant erosions of individual and property rights, VAT, import tarrifs and misc. taxes... which are CRIMINAL.

In Canada for instance, there is no valid system of property rights, yet we're all free. The government can come and take our land away from us any time they want, and we have no legal recourse except to demand payment. We have learned to be free within the confines of a quasi-socialist system that invisibly inhibits our economic freedom. Of course, they won't do anything extreme, for fear of retribution, but they can. And should a crisis emerge that provides the opportunity, they probably will, if history is any guide.

In a totalitarian democracy, the individual has freedom only to the extent that he or she does not oppose the majority (who probably feel free) will. In a dictatorship, he has freedom only to the extent that he does not oppose the law, which can change overnight. People tend to perceive freedom by what they can or cannot do, but they fail to grasp the powers, which enable them to defend it...
Vehicle Bank Sows the Seeds of Socialism

But you have a health care and education system that is free to all her citizens. How wonderful...Or is it? A perspective from sally pipes:

In truth, most Canadians sleep well at night knowing that if they get the flu, they can see a provider of primary care," Canadian-born Sally Pipes notes. Ms. Pipes, president of San Francisco’s Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, warns that from across the border, Canada’s system shimmers and shines–but up close, it falls short.

Individuals with exotic illnesses, in need of specialized care, quickly enter into Canada’s queue zone. They take their place in line and wait and wait, often suffering great pain and prolonged worry, hoping to be treated by a specialist before they are incapacitated."

(like my father did, took him 8 months to finally get his herniated disc operated on, and he still can't pick up his foot when he walks due to nerve damage.)
Her article



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-7-2005 @ 02:58 PM by Frosty


social democracy=cummunism



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-7-2005 @ 03:02 PM by Odium



Originally posted by Frosty
social democracy=cummunism


No it doesn't.

Go read a book on Communism or Socialism.

Just because you claim something doesn't make it true.

I am also waiting for the evidence that Native Americans are uneducated.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-7-2005 @ 09:38 PM by Frosty


Social Democracy is like saying Assualt Weapons, what you are really talking about AKs.

Native Americans barely had copper technology, thought the conquestadors were gods, ate each other, and couldn't advance beyond the bow and arrow and the canoe despite a lack of an outside large envading force.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2005 @ 08:04 AM by TrueLies



Originally posted by Odium

Originally posted by Frosty
social democracy=cummunism


No it doesn't.

Go read a book on Communism or Socialism.

Just because you claim something doesn't make it true.

I am also waiting for the evidence that Native Americans are uneducated.



Despite all that's happened in the past with communist/socialist leaders in powers you still think it's a great system... the people that lived through those time and are currently living in the system, hate it. those people that are coming to the us in rafts and anything else they can get a hand on, aren't leaving for a vacation, their country sucks, their standard of living is crap, but you have castro who's living it up, not living by his socialist principles at all, in fact hypocritical...

I will devulge into more points later on, have you ever rubbed elbows with someone who's lived in a communist/socialist country?
and if it's so great why aren't you making an attempt to pack up your things and go so you can experience what it's like, instead of daydreaming about it in theory. go live it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2005 @ 12:18 PM by Odium


TrueLies, I'm part Russian.

A lot of my family grew up in the U.S.S.R. but that doesn't stop the fact the systems that are in Government in such places were not Socialist systems.

You yourself even say so here "but you have castro who's living it up, not living by his socialist principles at all".

In turn that stops it from being a Socialist Nation.

You also seem to lack the understanding between Present China, Cuba, the U.S.S.R and what I posted. If you bother to take the time to do some research you would see my view is very critical of these Government just like it is of the "Western" Governments.

Frosty, you just keep showing me how foolish you really are.

Native Americans could use metal, however they didn't need to as they could use animal bone, etc, instead and it was quicker and easier to get. They only used metal when it bone was hard to come by.

However they did use Silver and Gold, Copper, Brass, etc depending on the tribe in question.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2005 @ 05:14 PM by TrueLies



Originally posted by Odium
TrueLies, I'm part Russian.

A lot of my family grew up in the U.S.S.R. but that doesn't stop the fact the systems that are in Government in such places were not Socialist systems.



Your family grew up in the ussr under whom?


You yourself even say so here "but you have castro who's living it up, not living by his socialist principles at all".

In turn that stops it from being a Socialist Nation.


In cuba those people don't see it as a non socialist union, just because castro doesn't adhere to the same principles he gives out to others doesn't make him think it's still not socialist.. It just makes himself an unaware hypocrite.


You also seem to lack the understanding between Present China, Cuba, the U.S.S.R and what I posted. If you bother to take the time to do some research you would see my view is very critical of these Government just like it is of the "Western" Governments.


What your signature tells me is that you like the ideas of guerilla warfare, they're marxist's, they have a justification for the slaughter of innocent civilians just like a bunch of other socialists throughout the century.

So what, do you believe in Marxist groups like FARC in Uruguay? Judging by your signature you like how guerilla's operate, so you must think the idea of giving colombian neckties is great. You don't achieve common ground with the people through killing them and the government in place. Why are you guys so hell bent on anti freedom?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2005 @ 07:10 PM by Odium


My Greatparents under Stalin, before they moved to the U.K. the rest of my family grew up under the various Russian leaders that existed after.

And? So the people have not ever been educated on what true Socialism is? How does that change things?

Just because the Bolsheviks in Russia called it a Communist Nation, does not make it so. It is like Mao saying he is a Capitalist. Both are not true.

As for my signature? How does that say I am fine with innocent people being hurt? How does it even make out such a thing? Unless you are attempting to claim Huey P. Newton wished for innocent people to be hurt? If so I'd like the date of the speech which he said such a thing as against the speeches where he spoke out against the riots (where people got hurt.)

There is a large difference between attacking a Government and an Arm of the State and Innocent people. Yet again you have not bothered to read my first post on this topic.

If I was against freedom why would I be pro direct democracy?

en.wikipedia.org...

Might be an interesting read for you as well. Just think about it.

[edit on 23/7/2005 by Odium]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2005 @ 09:38 PM by EastCoastKid



Originally posted by John Pearce
It's time to dispell the belief that true, pure, socialism, whether achieved through democratic or revolutionary means, could ever exsist. For a Socialist system to truely exist people would have to be "perfect", they would have to not be greedy, selfish, or self-indulgent. All of these things Socialists and Communists take so much for granted. But as demonstrated through history, the attempted application of a true Socialist system has NEVER, and will NEVER work because humans ARE NOT PERFECT


I apologize for getting into this debate late.. I don't know if anyone has pointed this out or not, but, there is one place it has proven to be quite effective: the US Military. Not sure if its socialist or communist, but its definitely one of the two if not both. The authoritarian way is the ONLY way you can run an Army. And trust me, its a well-oiled machine.

I was just telling my friend earlier today, I don't think most civilians ever even think of that. Why would they? They've never experienced either.

My experience in the military with their BS socialized medicine is one reason why I have always opposed it out here in our civilian capitialist system. The bottom line is this: you GET what you PAY for.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.266 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Politics at ATS Discussion Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread