|
|
Topic started on 28-6-2005 @ 01:28 PM by godservant
|
I received this from a friend in e-mail.
TAXES
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
Capital Gains Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Court Fines
(indirect taxes)
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax
(FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel permit tax
Gasoline Tax
(42 cents per gallon)
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax Interest expense
(tax on the money)
Inventory tax IRS Interest Charges
(tax on top of tax)
IRS Penalties
(tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Local Income Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Septic Permit Tax
Service Charge Taxes
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Taxes
(Truckers)
Sales Taxes
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Road Toll Booth Taxes
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax
(SUTA)
Telephone federal excise tax
Telephone federal universal service fee tax
Telephone federal, state and
local surcharge taxes
Telephone mi nimum usage surcharge tax
Telephone recurring and non-recurring charges tax
Telephone state and local tax
Telephone usage charge tax
Toll Bridge Taxes
Toll Tunnel Taxes
Traffic Fines
(indirect taxation)
Trailer Registration Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
COMMENTS:
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago and our nation was the most prosperous in the world, had absolutely no national debt, had the largest
middle class in the world and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
What the hell happened
------------------------------------------------
It is sad, especially knowing that income tax was NEVER supposed to touch the non-rich.
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Global Meltdown topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 01:37 PM by MCory1
|
I would like to add that a good portion of those taxes had little or no reason to exist 100 years ago. I mean, think about it, in 1900 there wasn't
a strong enough demand for gasoline to warrant any type of tax on it--all that would have done is make the purchase of gasoline-based engines even
less appealing. Same with the communication taxes (ie telephone); the telephone industry was still pretty young then. Taxing it would have just
prevented it from getting much of a foothold.
Hunting and fishing were still a minor role in people's survival out in the lesser developed areas at the time; that'd be like the government taxing
your loaf of bread at the grocery store today. Also, I'm not even sure if most of those licenses--CDL, Dog, Fishing, Hunting--were even issued at
the time. As far as the cigarette and liqour taxes go though, those are mainly "sin" taxes that have only been in place a relatively short amount
of time.
I'm not trying to completely knock the post; it's pretty bad no matter how you look at it. But at the same time, it was a different world back
then, and as the society changes so do the things the government sees it can make money off of.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 01:40 PM by ThichHeaded
|
Look into you wallet and look at the picture with Washington on it..
That is what happened, people are to into what the next best thing is.
This is becoming a problem with society.
We are not how we used to be, living live for our family. I bet if you had to save either your wallet with 200 bucks or your kid from falling off a
cliff I bet most would pick the wallet.. Cause think about it, whats the kid going to give you... Alot of problems...
Also life is more MTV and who goes the biggest ass or better hair or who is screwing who, or who started a war for no reason...
We as humans I think are the most #ed up species on this or any other planet.
We can give a rats ass less about god/spiritallity..
But at least we got all the money on the planet.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 01:43 PM by DCFusion
|
Very interesting post, but I think another thing that may (or may not) put this in a larger perspective is what taxes existed 100 years ago but do not
exist today. Could there be a relative evenness in regards to taxes that existed 100 years ago and those that exist today? As one tax was removed, was
another added so that really 'nothing went wrong', everything kind of stayed the same. I'll have to do a internet search and see if this could be
the case...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 01:51 PM by astrocreep
|
I have always thought we should do away with all the hidden taxes and just give everyone a bill on April 14th for their entire amount due the next day
and then April 16th, have election day!
If all these taxes are justified, why not just remove the red tape and just do it in one big lump some? I think you'd find a great many of our
politicians would become a bit more conservative in their spending and a little less apt to push so many taxes.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 03:07 PM by AlwaysLearning
|
Most of our tax dollars go to service the interest on debt, never the debt itself. And it doesn't matter where you live (except the Isle of
Guernsey). When countries gave up the right to coin and print their own money, in favour of borrowing it from private bankers, poof, the need for
income and most other forms of taxes.
Until countries take back the right to do this, and the banks practices are not reformed (fractional reserve banking), this is our lot in life. In
the U.S. the Federal Reserve of 1913 is a private entity which prints money on behalf of the government and lends it at interest. Funnily enough, in
the same year, the British North America act in Canada was amended without referendum and the Bank Act was born. Both countries have been victims of
the biggest scam since. Monetary reform is a must!
So Let's pop the bubble of ignorance, starting now. Click on the thread
and watch the fasinating documentary The Money Masters
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 28-6-2005 @ 03:52 PM by Legalizer
|
Lets not the Marihuana Stamp Tax act of 1937 that made it prohibitive for anyone to buy cannabis for food, fuel, fiber or medecine, and has been a
source of profit for criminals and state sanctioned racist scum for the past 70+ years.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 09:34 PM by mrwupy
|
Originally posted by DCFusion
Very interesting post, but I think another thing that may (or may not) put this in a larger perspective is what taxes existed 100 years ago but do not
exist today.
Excellent point. I was on a historical tour a few years back and the tour guide pointed out that the owners of a house had to pay a tax on each window
in the house, cause a window was considered a luxury back then.
Taxes change with the times.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 09:37 PM by crimvelvet
|
14% of those employed work directly for the US government. That does not count privately employed individuals, like safety and enviornmental
officers...That is where the money goes to pay for the huge beauracratic machine as well as the interest on the debt
How about we demand Congress spent the next twenty years REPEALING laws instead of creating new ones. Or we could use the other method, a revolution
and start with a clean slate.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 31-8-2008 @ 09:57 PM by In nothing we trust
|
Originally posted by crimvelvet
How about we demand Congress spent the next twenty years REPEALING laws instead of creating new ones. Or we could use the other method, a revolution
and start with a clean slate.
Realistically neither of those two events will happen.
Congress is under the direct influence of Isreal, so they have no interest in doing anything to benifit American citizens.
And there will not be an organized assult on the capital because no one can afford to take a couple weeks off of work and pay for the gas and
ammunition neccesary. It is possible that Russian communists might be willing to, help Americans fight for thier freedom and fund an insurgency on
U.S. soil. How organized such an effort could be is debatable.
There is more likely to be a complete breakdown of society followed by complete anarchy. First you will notice an increase in domestic violence,
followed by an increase in the divorce rate and a breakdown in the family unit. Ignorance and apathy will increase, there will be an increased gap
between the haves and have nots, rich people will become increasingly arrogant and condensending, traditional values will be thrown out the window,
lying will become the norm, propaganda will be rampant and the elite will attempt to maintain control through deception, force and warfare. Warfare is
kind of like a jobs program for pissed off poor people.
As the richest 1% begin to lose even this amount of influence on the population they will resort to more medieval methods of control, including but
not limited to extorsion, blackmail, imprisionment, kidnapping, torture and murder.
[edit on 31-8-2008 by In nothing we trust]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-9-2008 @ 07:37 AM by Andrew E. Wiggin
|
Ya know whats really funny?
2000 years from now - society is going to look back on us with the same disgust and foul disposition as we do today when looking back at stories in
the bible talking about tax collectors
back then there was ONE tax
this list today only gives us the tip of the ice burg
We have so many taxes because war is so expensive
Thats the only reason.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-9-2008 @ 10:17 AM by Relentless
|

Originally posted by In nothing we trust
First you will notice an increase in domestic violence, followed by an increase in the divorce rate and a breakdown in the family unit. Ignorance and
apathy will increase, there will be an increased gap between the haves and have nots, rich people will become increasingly arrogant and condensending,
traditional values will be thrown out the window, lying will become the norm, propaganda will be rampant and the elite will attempt to maintain
control through deception, force and warfare.
Wait a minute, aren't we already seeing ALL of this?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-9-2008 @ 03:02 AM by TheBadge
|
damn that list made me all queasy.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-10-2008 @ 06:39 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |