Originally posted by spymaster
HeYA Sminkey
you know i still cant the hang of the mulitple quote in my other debate

- It'll happen, just try and make good use of your preview function (and I have a habit of copying that too cos sometimes the page gets lost in an
error and won't move on as it were)

For arguments sake the Sterling has always been a very strong trading currency along with the Deutchmark, i am yet to be convinced of the
benefit to the UK/Germany/Holland and the likes of quiet ''well-off and stable'' countries like them as opposed to countries like Poland/Turkey
(this yr i think) Malta/Sloviaki and the like of them type of countries that have never had a strong currnecy and stable ''zone''.

- I suppose it comes down to the fact that they are in 'our' zone however you look at it.
We (or 'all' in each of these blocks) all trade together and are close anyway, this is merely a logical extension of current realities IMO.
IMO so far the UK has gotten away with being between the 2 big block currencies (the US $ and the Euro) but there are no guarantees that situation
will continue indefinitely, life could get decidedly uncomfortable if we end up being sqeezed between the two.

Would this be the same say with
Japan /Brunei/Singapore (who are the top 3 richest countries in Asia) would they have to ''bail'' out the 3 poorest countries in Asia which are
East Timor/Nepal/Thailand.

- It would appear that the same logic is driving them too.
They may be further away from it but it is worth remembering the Euro took decades to create.
Maybe they will have it a little easier because several Asian countries have recent experience of using a formal 'tie' to another currency (to the
US $)?

Just as with the euro (my opinion) they has got to be a stop somewhere when ''charity begins at home''.

- I realise this comes down to POV but as is the case with all these collective ventures the whole point is that ultimately 'their' gain is 'our'
benefit, speaking long-term and as Europe's recent post-war history shows, it works.
However
'laissez fair' US economists might be today their forefathers realised this with the original post WW2 Marshall plan.

You know my views on the wealth in the world today we agreed on that one mate, but perhaps this 'whole thing would ONLY work'' if it was a
Global Curency, but then we step into the depths of the NWO type of scenario...different thread for that mate heheheheh.

- That may indeed come one day although whether it is the nightmare some insist on seeing is another matter.
But in view of how far off the 'blocks' are in making their own common currencies just now I'd say that is quite some way off.
- You're entitled to your view same as anyone sm.
I'd just point out that it already is working (and ever since it's creation despite some gyrations right at the start or complaints of some it has
maintained it's value well within the 'band' of what it's constituent parts were worth).
Like any currency before it that does not mean all is suddenly milk and honey.
It certainly does not solve every problem in and of itself.
But it does reduce costs and it does promote greater economic stability and harmony which should be a better overall situation for us than what went
before.

all the best sminkey

- You too sm.