Originally posted by rdang
The American citizens "spied" on obviously had terrorism ties,or some type of suspicious activity.Or did Bush pick names out of the phone book. The
apologists always try to simplify to meet their ends. Princess Diana was she not a British citizen? How is that ok?Who knows what else Clinton did
during his reign.
Presidents aren't kings, they are accountable to the American people and held in check from corrpution by legal authority.
Without a warrant, then how do you know Bush didn't just pick names from a telephone book? Or are we supposed to blindly accept whatever our
Presidents do? Even Clinton?
If, by your logic, Bush can spy on any US citizen he chooses without explaining himself to the law, then Clinton should have the same right to spy on
anyone he chooses.
