Here's an article that did some interesting research to show that there is a huge disparity in the number of medals given out to soldiers in WW 2,
Korea/Vietnam and Iraq.
Are there fewer heroes in the Iraq war than in previous wars? That's the message the Pentagon is sending, say critics, by not awarding today's
soldiers nearly as many of the nation's highest military honors. Three and a half years of combat in Iraq, for example, have produced only two
winners of the Medal of Honor, the country's highest military award for bravery in combat. There were, by contrast, 464 Medals of Honor handed out
during America's involvement in World War II, which lasted the same amount of time. If the government had been as stingy then as it is now, adjusting
for the number of Americans who served, there would have been only 30 Medals of Honor won in the fight against fascism. The same applies to the second
highest honor, the service crosses: there were 8,716 of those given out during World War II and just 26 so far in Iraq.
So what's different in this war? For one thing, the process for getting medals has become more cumbersome. Some commanders are reacting against what
they see as medal inflation in recent wars, especially Gulf War I. And there may be fewer opportunities for Audie Murphy--style heroics when your
enemy is planting improvised explosive devices (IEDs) or driving a car bomb. But the nearly 3,000 war dead testify to the peril of those fighting in
Iraq, and a growing chorus has been speaking out against the Pentagon's parsimony. They're asking why there have not been more élite medals and why
there have been huge disparities in the number of awards given by different branches of the military. "We need to look into the criteria used and the
timing. There are obvious inequities," says Congressman John McHugh, a Republican from New York.
The House Armed Services Subcommittee on Military Personnel that McHugh chairs is launching an inquiry this week into the way medals have been awarded
in Iraq. The Department of Defense may be required to issue new standards or even reopen cases in which medals have been turned down or downgraded.
The Pentagon, meanwhile, says it needed its own review to consider how combat--and how the military quantifies heroism--has changed since 9/11. It is
considering whether there should be new guidelines set for consistency across the services. The Army, for example, has displayed a stunning generosity
in handing out the mid-level Bronze Star medals: it has given out an astonishing 52,000 since 9/11, compared with fewer than 1,500 for the Marines.
It's interesting to note the large disparity in the number of medals given out by each individual armed force. I wonder how the number of medals
given out compare to the total # of troops each armed force has in the region right now.
I'm wondering if the current administration is hesitant to hand out these medals because that would validate alot of the claims that the country is
in major disrepair and not ready to operate on its own. Or maybe it's just typical government bureaucracy.
[edit on 12/17/2006 by SmallMindsBigIdeas]