Conspiracy Search  Gear Store  Member Blogs  Podcasts  TinWiki  Political News  BelowTopSecret  AboveTopSecret 


 

 

This topic is in the Political Ideology discussion forum.  (rss)


China vs. U.S.A.




Topic started on 13-6-2007 @ 11:38 PM by MyEternaldream


what do you think the out come will be if China and the USA get into a war since the US Has large amount of weapons and china has a very large cuantaty of man power?



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Political Ideology topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 13-6-2007 @ 11:50 PM by iori_komei


Barring the use of Nuclear weapons, which fortunately both sides seem to be smart enough not to use.

I think though that it would depend, if you mean just taking out PRChina's military and production
capabilities, it would probably take up to a year at the most, though if we were invading them,
I think it would take a very long time, and would be a drawn out and bloody war,
resulting in losses to both sides.

In the end though, the U.S. would win, simply because we are much more technologically advanced,
and have several high-tech allies close by, those being Japan, Australia, the Republic of China Taiwan
(PRChina would try to invade them if we went to war, so they would side with us naturally) and
several other countries with less sophisticated, but still capable militaries.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-6-2007 @ 03:43 AM by sy.gunson


the war between China and USA started 20 years ago. The weapons used was trade. So far the score is 10:1 in favour of China.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-7-2007 @ 05:45 AM by ozvulcan


As an Australian i can definately tell you that Australia would never join the U.S in a war against China for political and economic reasons, we would rather tear up the ANZUS treaty and say go to hell to the U.S Government.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 13-7-2007 @ 02:59 AM by aylyan


That would depend on which government was in power at the time.Jumpin Johnny would follow the US lead no matter what.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-10-2007 @ 06:00 AM by TKainZero


Well, the US own the Sea, and the Air, and thankfuly the Chiniese can't walk across the Pacific, so the US would dominate, totaly crippleing China within 72 hours.

The truth is, the US could cripple every country on earth within 72 hours, however a land based invasion/occupation it cannot.

The US army is designed to win battles, and Crush thier enimies, not to occupy lands.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-10-2007 @ 02:43 PM by SpeakerofTruth


Barring the use of nuclear weaponry, I hate to say it, but the United States loses. Of course, it's a mute point because if the U.S ever finds itself in a position where its system is likely to come crashing down, it will be fireballs away.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 11:21 AM by traderonwallst


reply to post by ozvulcan



Highly doubt that. Australia has prudly fought along side us in just about every war we have fought in the last 100 years. We welcome the strentgh of the Australian forces and thank them for their great fighting capabilities.

Plus Australian leaders are not stupid. Any war with China would lead to aggression on the Chinese into all areas of their region. You guys live in their region and would be a target, and we will glady send thousands of troops to defend you at all costs.

Thanks again for all your help in the past, it will never be forgotten.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 11:32 AM by jerico65


Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Barring the use of nuclear weaponry, I hate to say it, but the United States loses. Of course, it's a mute point because if the U.S ever finds itself in a position where its system is likely to come crashing down, it will be fireballs away.


You don't think the Chinese would, too? We kick their butts, and they are set to lose the war. You don't think they'd fire nukes?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-10-2007 @ 02:19 PM by SpeakerofTruth


Jerico, it doesn't even have to be China. If America ever finds itself in a position, no matter who the enemy is, where it is in fear that its whole system is in danger, you can almost bet that nuclear weaponry will be used.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 17-10-2007 @ 07:43 PM by jerico65


Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
Jerico, it doesn't even have to be China. If America ever finds itself in a position, no matter who the enemy is, where it is in fear that its whole system is in danger, you can almost bet that nuclear weaponry will be used.


I just don't think it's a "US Only" strategy. I think China, Russia, anyone with a nuke, if they were up against the ropes; they'd use it.



   copyright & usage 


























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.028 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Politics at ATS Discussion Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]