Originally posted by Sestias
Your source is very partisan. Hillary has run a very strong campaign and received many, many votes. The fact that Obama is so popular and has run an
equally strong campaign doesn't make Hillary a flop. It only means Obama is an awesome contender.

Well said. Sen. Clinton and Sen Obama are basically running neck-to-neck. In fact this years Democratic fight for the party nomination is a perfect
example of two STRONG candidates running against one another. Sure the Clinton camp has made some mistakes, but their performance is no where near

an embarrassingly bad campaign

In fact it is MHO that the person who wrote that article is the one whose performance is bordering on "embarrassingly bad". Sure it is fun, and
common, to pick on the other side, still it only makes sense to employ REALITY when you do it.
My response to this is quite simple, the Republican Machine is underhandedly trying to tear down both Obama and Clinton. By equating Clinton's
campaign to "embarrassingly bad" means that who ever wins looks not so good. If it is Obama, then "he was barely able to beat poor Hilary's
Campaign", if it is Clinton who wins, well they have been bashing her in preparation for the presidential run for years so you don't need me to fill
in that blank.