Originally posted by Ste2652
To be fair, only one of the sources you list isn't a British tabloid. One rule I've come to use is that you should never rely on the tabloids for
accurate information on certain issues (immigration being one of them).

To be fair, tabloids are "sensationalist" - but they can't be any worse than the BBC!
Originally posted by Ste2652
You do raise an interesting point, though... would increased automation be a better way overall? It certainly couldn't solve all labour shortages but
it might help.

I apologise if I appear "xenophobic", or even "racist", (Note: I'm a New Zealander, not a Briton - just classifying), but I believe that the
current "flood" of immigration throughout Europe, America etc is nothing more than a politically, socially and economically dangerous Ponzi scheme,
designed to obtain economic growth
at all costs.
Already, there is much concern that non-white immigrants to Europe have higher birth-rates than the native Europeans, and that in 50 or so years they
may make up..."sizeable" minorities. Now, there has not been a
single country, nation or empire that has been able to rule over minorities
20%+ without either resorting to:
1.
Oppression - the economically/politically/militarily powerful minority lords it over the others using the threat of military action, secret
police etc, eventually leading to a powderkeg scenario which will result either in peaceful disintegration of the state, or violent disintegration of
the state. (Historical Example: The U.S.S.R)
2.
Integration - either by direct/indirect means, integration both ethnically and culturally is encouraged/enforced, leading to a single
"super-culture" and "super-ethnicity", removing all trace of ethnic/cultural differences. (Historical example: Post-Roman Britain).
3.
Division - often the result of the first scenario, ethnic tensions erupt, destroying the country and ending with "ethnically homogenous"
regions, as the dominant "minorities" of each region ethnically cleanse the others through acts of violence or intimidation. (Historical Example:
Yugoslavia).
Continuing on the subject of birth-rates, native Japanese have quite possibly some of the lowest birth-rates of the industrialised world - however
they have heavy immigration restrictions in place and are developing/using robots to fill gaps in "unskilled labour". But the point is, in 50 years
Japan may have a catastrophic population decline to 50% of the current population, however
Japan will still be almost-completely Japanese.
What can be said of the current trends in Europe and the rest of the West?