This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum.  (rss)


In Speech Before Israeli Parliament, Bush Compares Democrats To 'Nazi Appeasers'


<<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>



reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 06:58 AM by Gatordone





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 07:34 AM by TheBandit795


You know what's funny?

The surge of posts in this thread about America this, America that. Bush is great etc.. etc..

Well guess what. Bush is a liberal, as liberal as can be (considering the definition of "liberal" that you guys use). And that can be proven by looking at the actions of his administration.

And as far as I know, he has never denounced his grandfather's dealings and actions during the world war, nor will he ever. I don't think he was raised to ever do that. Especially seeing that he had practically the same upbringing and values as his grandfather.

It is also funny that he is comparing democrats to Nazi appeasers seeing that the republicans and democrats work for the same people and towards the same goal, something which I've posted about enough times already.

You can prefer to stay ignorant and think that there is a difference between republicans and democrats, and keep on feeding the divide that they are using to conquer you and yours; or you can stop that see them for who they really are: traitors who will stop at nothing to destroy the constitution and cause the United States to lose it's sovereignty to another political entity.

Your choice.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 07:54 AM by q_ball


Bush, another great man another famous speaker



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 07:54 AM by Gatordone


reply to post by TheBandit795



That'a a beautiful platitude from which to see the internal collapse of the most successful nation on the planet.

The politicians have always been after more power. The difference is the new, indoctrinated instead of educated youth and the apathy of parents who let the education system destroy the next generations pride.

None of which, all though interesting and worth debate, has anything at all to do with the OP. Remember that? You guys, as usual, listened to CNN tell you what Bush said. Then, even though CNN lied to you, you've all gone on this huge programmed response to anything/everything Bush.

Sure, hate me. "Deny your ignorance" and tolerate only communism and Anti-American views.

I swear reading these posts reminds me of a listening to a bunch of loser social studies teachers in the teachers lounge complain about things they have no concept of but they cant wait to "teach"...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 08:03 AM by djerwulfe


reply to post by jimmyx



Can you show me the study/source?
Because your assertion doesn't explain the national averages of hours of TV viewing per day, which I think is up to an all-time high. And if you're "following the money" I think that should be an indicator of where US citizens head are. I suppose surfing the web might be a factor, but it's really not that much different when you see where the majority of web traffic flows.

So I don't know about your figures. And even if you're right, you have only to look at pop music sales, home video sales, print headlines, etc.
Stupid stuff. But that's just my opinion.
So how about that study?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 08:09 AM by TheBandit795


reply to post by Gatordone



Why thank you for your sarcasm. Anyway, for your info: I tolerate anything that abides by the T&C of this website, and only that. Anything else, goes.

As for the claim that what he said was not true, show the proof that he didn't say it. Simple. If he didn't say it, I'll accept that with ease. It still won't take away the fact that due to his actions he is far from being a real republican. A REAL CONSERVATIVE.



[edit on 16-5-2008 by TheBandit795]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 08:09 AM by djerwulfe


Oh, and this is a fascist nation. I mean, with a smile, though.
Ba-dap-bah-bah-bah, I'm lovin' it!

National partisan politics is a joke. Conservative, Liberal, ?? Democrats...

Two parties? For all these voices and specific concerns?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 10:16 AM by Thurisaz



Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira
Good one Dubya.

Appeasement


lmao - appeasement is a big word... how did he manage to get that out in a legible order?



[edit on 16-5-2008 by Thurisaz]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 01:09 PM by acegotflows


wow, a Nazi calling democrats nazi appeasers. Good job Curious George Sherff. I guess it's time to kill more people with his stolen tesla tech...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 01:19 PM by tomfrusso





reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 01:58 PM by The Nighthawk



Originally posted by tomfrusso

GO BUSH............................................

GO BUSH.......................................

GO BUSH...................................

GO BUSH............................


.............Straight to Prison when all the crap you've done catches up to you!!!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 02:20 PM by The Godfather of Conspira


reply to post by tomfrusso




and talks the way he should have been speaking for the last 5 years.


What is it our fault he only just decided to switch his brain ON?


Originally posted by Thurisaz
lmao - appeasement is a big word... how did he manage to get that out in a legible order?


I know, I would at least expected some stuttering or something...
This could be a turning point folks.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 02:23 PM by kindred


Bush: God told me to invade Iraq



President George Bush has claimed he was told by God to invade Iraq and attack Osama bin Laden's stronghold of Afghanistan as part of a divine mission to bring peace to the Middle East, security for Israel, and a state for the Palestinians.


The President made the assertion during his first meeting with Palestinian leaders in June 2003, according to a BBC series which will be broadcast this month.

The revelation comes after Mr Bush launched an impassioned attack yesterday in Washington on Islamic militants, likening their ideology to that of Communism, and accusing them of seeking to "enslave whole nations" and set up a radical Islamic empire "that spans from Spain to Indonesia". In the programmeElusive Peace: Israel and the Arabs, which starts on Monday, the former Palestinian foreign minister Nabil Shaath says Mr Bush told him and Mahmoud Abbas, former prime minister and now Palestinian President: "I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, 'George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan.' And I did, and then God would tell me, 'George go and end the tyranny in Iraq,' and I did."

And "now again", Mr Bush is quoted as telling the two, "I feel God's words coming to me: 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East.' And by God, I'm gonna do it."

Mr Abbas remembers how the US President told him he had a "moral and religious obligation" to act. The White House has refused to comment on what it terms a private conversation. But the BBC account is anything but implausible, given how throughout his presidency Mr Bush, a born-again Christian, has never hidden the importance of his faith.

From the outset he has couched the "global war on terror" in quasi-religious terms, as a struggle between good and evil. Al-Qa'ida terrorists are routinely described as evil-doers. For Mr Bush, the invasion of Iraq has always been part of the struggle against terrorism, and he appears to see himself as the executor of the divine will.

He told Bob Woodward - whose 2004 book, Plan of Attack, is the definitive account of the administration's road to war in Iraq - that after giving the order to invade in March 2003, he walked in the White House garden, praying "that our troops be safe, be protected by the Almighty". As he went into this critical period, he told Mr Woodward, "I was praying for strength to do the Lord's will.

"I'm surely not going to justify war based upon God. Understand that. Nevertheless, in my case, I pray that I will be as good a messenger of His will as possible. And then of course, I pray for forgiveness."

Another telling sign of Mr Bush's religion was his answer to Mr Woodward's question on whether he had asked his father - the former president who refused to launch a full-scale invasion of Iraq after driving Saddam Hussein from Kuwait in 1991 - for advice on what to do.

The current President replied that his earthly father was "the wrong father to appeal to for advice ... there is a higher father that I appeal to".

The same sense of mission permeated his speech at the National Endowment of Democracy yesterday. Its main news was Mr Bush's claim that Western security services had thwarted 10 planned attacks by al-Qa'ida since 11 September 2001, three of them against mainland US.

More striking though was his unrelenting portrayal of radical Islam as a global menace, which only the forces of freedom - led by the US - could repel. It was delivered at a moment when Mr Bush's domestic approval ratings are at their lowest ebb, in large part because of the war in Iraq, in which 1,950 US troops have died, with no end in sight.

It came amid continuing violence on the ground, nine days before the critical referendum on the new constitution that offers perhaps the last chance of securing a unitary and democratic Iraq. "The militants believe that controlling one country will rally the Muslim masses, enabling them to overthrow all moderate governments in the region" and set up a radical empire stretching from Spain to Indonesia, he said.

The insurgents' aim was to "enslave whole nations and intimidate the world". He portrayed Islamic radicals as a single global movement, from the Middle East to Chechnya and Bali and the jungles of the Philippines.

He rejected claims that the US military presence in Iraq was fuelling terrorism: 11 September 2001 occurred long before American troops set foot in Iraq - and Russia's opposition to the invasion did not stop terrorists carrying out the Beslan atrocity in which 300 children died.

Mr Bush also accused Syria and Iran of supporting radical groups. They "have a long history of collaboration with terrorists and they deserve no patience". The US, he warned, "makes no distinction between those who commit acts of terror and those who support and harbour them because they're equally as guilty of murder".

"Wars are not won without sacrifice and this war will require more sacrifice, more time and more resolve," Mr Bush declared. But progress was being made in Iraq, and, he proclaimed: "We will keep our nerve and we will win that victory."


www.independent.co.uk...

Bush is a complete nut who should be locked up and the fact that he thinks GOD talks to him, proves it.




[edit on 16-5-2008 by kindred]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 02:26 PM by DimensionalDetective



Originally posted by The Godfather of Conspira


Originally posted by Thurisaz
lmao - appeasement is a big word... how did he manage to get that out in a legible order?


I know, I would at least expected some stuttering or something...
This could be a turning point folks.


Well he may have had his special "earpiece" in that he had during the last debates, where his pupeteers feed him what to say, so he doesn't come off as the the town drunk as usual.


On a side note, I noticed no one commented on the expose I posted a couple of pages back on this idiots family being tied heavily into Nazi interests...

Pretty ironic that this same clown is giving such a speech when his own family got rich off of Nazi interests.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 03:48 PM by xmotex


Well it's typical, the far right types love to bring about Hitler and Chamberlain, but at the time guess who it was saying we should stay out of WW2, because Hitler was too powerful to fight, and that we should stay out of WW2 and let Hitler take over Europe?

One guess?

The far right, of course

And the man who led us to victory in that war was arguably farther to the left than any US President before or since.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 04:28 PM by Anonymous ATS


Why isn't anybody talking about the press lying about what Bush said? Bush didn't attack dems or Obama. In fact, if the other poster is correct, the Senator he referred to was Republican. So how does the press get away with misrepresenting this and nobody cares?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 04:48 PM by wutone


In his speech, Bush said, “As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is – the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”

Ok I am assuming this is the line that gets everyone all riled up.

I listened to the speech and I have no idea where any reference to Obama or other democrats (well maybe Carter) was made. Unless Obama actually could have talked to Hitler.....

What is hilarious and yet at the same time dead serious is that there is white house staff that are baiting the democrats into another trap like the one where they went along with the Iraq war idea.

Bush and his media sympathizers can easily say that the speech wasn't about any particular democrat (maybe except Carter), which is true, but they can point out the sheer overreaction and defensiveness of the democrats.

The overreaction and defensiveness puts the dems into a trap.

What happens if an "incident" occurs between Iran and U.S. allied forces?

Bush can call for action and the democrats are going to be in the same trap like they were at the start of the Iraqi war. The democrats will be all over the map with their positions and sheer confusion will set in for those in opposition.

Besides if Bush really is a warmonger, which he most likely is, aren't the democrats really appeasers anyways for not standing up to him. I think Bush inadvertently hit a soft spot, although I am under the firm belief that the democrats would have gone to war with Iraq anyways if they were in charge.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 04:54 PM by DimensionalDetective


reply to post by wutone



I think pretty much EVERYONE, including myself agree with the gist of what you're saying. Whether Bush was or was not referring to Obama, or anyone else in congress as appeasists, in any sense of THAT word he is correct. Only he fails to see WHO exactly they are appeasists for---Namely HIMSELF.

lol



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-5-2008 @ 05:00 PM by Gatordone


reply to post by wutone



ThankYou!

Someone is actually on topic! AND they actually saw the speech instead of reading what CNN SAID he SAID!

I bet Bush WAS talking about Carter.

With all the off-topic, short response, extensive external quotes, and two posts to focus misguided hatred on half of Americans (which I will take personally, here and on the street), you might have forgotten how wrong you all were from the beginning of this thread, and how wrong you all will continue to be.

Eh Bandit?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.159 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Politics at ATS Discussion Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread
Forums Directory